Comments: (31)

Performance Review: Under Armour Micro G Black Ice

Use ← → (arrow) keys for new photos & posts

Performance Review: Under Armour Micro G Black Ice
Like Black Ice, You Never Saw It Coming

I have to start this review by telling everyone I have been less than moved by Under Armour over the past few years. When it first hit the scene, I was sold on both Cool and Heat Gear, and that was all they had on the market. Eventually (and inevitably), they branched into shoes, bringing the first round of cross-trainers to the market for football. Who can forget the “Click-clack, I think you hear us coming” commercials? I admit I looked at this move like I did Nike making golf clubs: focus on what you know and do it well, and leave the others to those guys over there. However, contrary to popular opinion, I actually loved the Under Armour running shoes when they arrived. Admittedly maybe not as technical as Asics or NB, they still had something about them that I liked, and the Fit-Sleeve I thought really helped in comfort and fit.

Now, after a year and a half of waiting, I have in my hands the first round of Under Armour Basketball shoes and Brandon Jennings’ first signature shoe to hit retail: the Micro G Black Ice. And I have to say, Under Armour, I had no idea you would come out like this. Continue reading for the full Under Armour Micro G Black Ice performance review…

First, like most anyone, is the appearance when the box was opened. My first thought was “Jordan XIII”, and not without warrant. The side panels are made up of the same dimpled mesh as that model Air Jordan, only for the dimples being less pronounced and more numerous. I know the white colorways have leather sides, so I am not sure of any performance differences, but I love the mesh. I normally hate when people on message boards immediately begin comparing every shoe that comes out to Jordans, as if there are no more original ideas out there and every designer copies the Jumpman, but I could not help think also of the Air Jordan 2010 when I saw the ankle collar. The cut is extremely asymmetrical and draws the eyes immediately. Matter of fact, everything about this shoe makes you want to look twice. It is just a beautiful blend of textures and materials that come together nicely. The forefoot strap is a brushed rubber and has an almost aluminum look to it (like the primer black on test cars). The sole, while it looks black in the pictures, is really “black ice”, a dark transparent with the black midsole behind it.

Black Ice “shattered glass” solid rubber traction outsole.


The strap comes over from the medial side right along the ball joint, but it has to be pulled very hard and the shoe laced tight to notice any difference.


Another detail that reminded me of a Jordan was the white stitching and exposed heel counter, a’ la the Air Jordan XXII.

The most surprising thing about the shoe, having so much mesh and a relatively thin midsole, was the weight. I am no stickler for lightweight shoes, and I really think the whole lighter shoe = better performance is greatly exaggerated. Granted, boots don’t help, but really, the difference in a couple ounces to most people is overblown. That said, I thought the shoe would be closer to the Kobe IV, but it actually weighed in at just over 15 ounces in a size 10.5, not heavy by any real standards. I am sure some of this was due to the forefoot strap, since it is made of a rubber compound, and if you have to have lighter I guess you could cut it off, but I wouldn’t go that far just to say it was lighter. Now, for the real question, “Where can I go play, NOW!!!”

The shoe is very straight-forward in lacing, just six simple metal eyelets straight up the shoe. The laces do stop before the strap so across the forefoot is lacking in lace support. This is not a problem, however, because the inner of the shoe is lined with a tongue/half-foot bootie thick with mesh and padding to keep the lockdown strong. The mesh side panels contributed highly to the fit as well, showing an ability to flex and move with the foot without losing shape. The patent leather rand/Cobec toe cap keep form very well and stop any additional movement while playing, leading to a very responsive feel on court. I felt no lace pressure ANYWHERE in the shoe, which is unusual to me for a mid. I usually get a little pressure on the front of the ankle at times, but none in these after a 4-day-straight playing binge. Anybody who has read my past reviews knows I lace as tight as possible, but in these there was no need. The ankle is very thickly padded with what seems like a memory foam, but not as dense as in most shoes. The ankle cut prevents any slipping, and the solid, exposed heel counter kept my foot right over the foot bed at all times. There was no movement, EVER, in my week of playing. Breathability was about average. I figured the mesh side panels and Under Armour reputation for moisture absorption would keep breathability to a premium, but the fit sleeve and thick ankle padding kept some heat in, but no more than usual. Nothing really to worry about in my mind. One thing, however: I am partial to no-shows, and the stiff ankle/mesh makeup makes it very hard to play in them, especially along the Achilles. Wear a short quarter or higher (I went to size 6-8 Nike Elites after the first wearing) and you will be good to go.


Even in no-shows, the ankle is still cut low.

The first thing I noticed when I stepped on the gym floor was the bounce from the Micro G. I immediately thought of the Kobe IV; it felt like full-length Lunar Foam. I really can’t say enough about it. The cushioning felt exactly right for my foot. Very low-profile, very responsive, and so far has shown no signs of deterioration (I know it has only been a week, but how many of us saw a difference in the Kobe IV after a week?). After talking to Ryan Drew, Basketball Category Leader at Under Armour, I found out that:

“Micro G is a high-rebound, low compression-set foam compound that allows us to reduce the thickness of the foam by approx 25% to 30% versus standard EVA foams, resulting in a lighter weight midsole part with great performance properties. The high-rebound (or high energy return) provides a bouncier, livelier feel than you would get from standard EVA, and the lower compression set means that the foam will retain it’s cushioning properties over a longer period of time. In the Black Ice there are 3 separate layers of Micro G. The external Micro G midsole that you see on the outside of the shoe…an internal Micro G midsole that is overlasted or “feathered”, and a molded 6mm Micro G sockliner that provides an incredible ride. Given that the sockliner is the closest part to the foot, we wanted to make sure that we put almost 3 times more cost into our sockliner than most brands, even at higher pricepoints. A quality sockliner is usually the first thing that is eliminated to save costs…we wanted to make sure it was the first thing that stayed.”

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Proponents of full-length Zoom Air need to check these out, as this is the closest I can find to that feel. The shoe feels like it is sitting right on the floor, but has a springiness I haven’t felt in any another brand but Nike. The insole is a definite revelation, as one of my pet peeves lately has been companies putting in less-than-performance sockliners. My last review, the Hops Ol’Skool, was also a pleasant surprise in this regard, and I have never understood why we spend $100+ on a shoe then have to put in aftermarket accessories. In application, the step in comfort is top-notch; I can’t think of a shoe with a better sockliner in my closet (except the LeBron IV Zoom-liner). The forefoot also visually looks to be thicker than the heel, giving the shoe a toe-up feel, screaming “I NEED TO RUN!!”


The Black Ice insole before wearing.

As noted above, the external heel counter does a great job of keeping the heel stable and aligned over the footbed. It has the look of being cut extremely high but is outlined in the patterned leather rand. It is actually about as high as a running shoe would be, which makes sense with the ankle cut. The forefoot is outfitted with an outrigger that is very subtle in appearance as it gradually grows in width the farther back it goes, not just stuck on the side of the shoe as an afterthought. When I removed the sockliner, the first thing I did was feel for cushioning consistency throughout the midsole. I was surprised by the feel under the arch, as a hidden midfoot shank was felt. Learning from others’ mistakes, however, UA didn’t use a full-length, stiff plate. Again, according to Ryan Drew:

“The Black Ice uses a 2mm thick, 30mm wide midfoot nylon shank that runs from just in front of the heel up to the forefoot. It’s molded into the topside of the internal Micro G foam midsole part, and sits under a 2mm thick foam strobel. The shank allows for proper midfoot flex, torsional rigidity, and lateral stability…it’s the structure that you’re feeling under your arch. It’s also important to note that our “last” shape has slightly more arch and an anatomical heel shape that gives the ballplayer more support in the midfoot and better heel lock than a lot of shoes on the market. Most brands have gone away from any type of arch shape in an effort to make sure they cover a broader range of foot types and arch shapes (primarily flat arches).”

I found this kept the shoe from ever feeling stiff from too much support and allows the forefoot to flex naturally with the shoe while providing excellent support through the arch and midfoot.

After 6 days, four in a row, of multi-hour, full-court runs, I can say this shoe is still impressive every time I lace them up. The midsole is reminiscent of the Huarache 2K5 with the way it deflects at angles and did take some adjustment. Being a bigger guard, I was worried about the minimal midsole, but I still have not experienced any jarring landings or numbness or shin splints from lack of forefoot cushioning. Traction was above par, but not biting like I have found in the Air Jordan XXI and Reebok Answer IX. I think this may have to do with the translucent outsole grabbing the dust from all over the floor, and some that was still outside, but a couple of quick wipes every few minutes and I was good to go. The ankle cut, probably the most visual element of the shoe, really did help with mobility and a feeling of quickness. We all know if you are quick, you just are, but any little bit helps. Brandon Jennings’ stitched-in signature adds a personal element to the shoe, just so you know he has next.

So far, I have noticed no busted stitches, very little midsole compression, and only slight scuffs and scratches on the toe cap. Of course there are the requisite wrinkles in the mesh and toe cap, but people, WEAR YOUR SHOES and deal with it. Until they rip apart from it, I think it gives character.


The above three pictures are after a solid 6 wearings of full court. VERY little wear and tear.

Well, that about wraps it up. I have run out of compliments to give to what I think will be the underrated shoe of the year. The only thing I can even pick at is the traction, and even that was good. I rank this shoe right up there with the Nike Zoom Kobe IV, adidas Supernatural Creator (my favorite from last year), and above another favorite last year, the Jordan XVI.5. I dare say I like it more than the Kobe V, but don’t shoot me yet. As I sit here finishing this up, I am waiting for the chance to lace them back up and get back on the court.

This shoe is greatness in a black box. And like the black ice I see here in Texas every winter, I never saw it coming.

-Review by Bryan Hinkle, aka Duke4005

Use ← → (arrow) keys for new photos & posts

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Category : Features, Reviews, Under Armour

Comments (31)

Sounds like UA killed it with this first launch shoe. Great review, Bryan.

BTW, if anyone needs cliff notes, here’s what Bryan wrote in another post:

“The Black Ice is one of the best shoes I have put on my feet in about 3 years, tied with the Super Creator and Kobe IV. I don’t know how the first shoe from a company can be this good, but I can not find anything wrong from top to bottom after two weeks.”

http://counterkicks.com/2010/10/18/video-brandon-jennings-under-armour-micro-g-basketball-lineup/#comments

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +4 (from 6 votes)

Wow…looks like Under Armour hit a home run with these. I was gonna cop the shoes anyways but now I feel even better about it. Hooks up perfect off court too, I think the strap cleans up nicely with Brandon’s style. Great review!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

Will definitely be getting these shoes and the Fly’s this weekend. Micro G cushioning sounds like a winner.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Great review. Thanks!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

This review just convinced me to buy into UnderArmour, which I was already leaning towards! I am excited for this shoe!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Really thorough review. Appreciate info like this, I’m glad UA lived up to the hype. Been waiting for some bball kicks for couple years from them. Black Ices are pretty fresh for 110. I would take those over some overpriced dubFusion Jordan’s anyday. Bucks colors are working for the shoe. Nice work .

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

right on with the review. this is why i love this site..actual indepth info. i hope they make the next shoes even more personalized for BJ. these grew on me. i still really want the blurs

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

Finally got ball kicks to match my Heat Gear tops.

Very good review!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

Nice post. Black Ice is mad nice in the all blacks

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

They sound legit but I gotta feel em on my feet 1st before I go out and buy em. I’ve rocked everything from Reeboks, And 1’s, adidas and Nike; but I always find myself going back to the swoosh because they’ve been in the game for a minute. How’d you get your hands on em early anyways? And how do you know these design guys from Under Armour? It smells a little fishy to me

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 1.7/5 (6 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: -11 (from 13 votes)

I still think the rear of the midsole and the triple stitching look like the XX2. Other than that i looks pretty tight, the outsole is kinda ugly though

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 2.8/5 (4 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: -1 (from 3 votes)

@TommyGunz: Definitely go out this weekend and try on a pair of the UA basketball kicks. You can compare it yourself. We got a production pair early for the exact purposes of this post – to share with all of you what you might expect from the shoe in advance of its official release. The quotes from Ryan Drew in the piece were simply responses to specific Black Ice details Bryan had after wear testing the shoes. We’ve got interviews up on the site already with Brandon Jennings (http://counterkicks.com/2010/09/03/counterkicks-interviews-brandon-jennings) and UA’s Gene McCarthy (http://counterkicks.com/2010/09/01/counterkicks-interviews-gene-mccarthy-under-armour-senior-vice-president-of-footwear) among countless other industry heads every week so we’re obviously hitting straight at first-hand sources to get everyone the best info on what a product is or isn’t like any serious coverage should. I don’t even understand your question anymore. It’s like you’re accusing us of being too thorough and professional. Haha.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +9 (from 9 votes)

Sicck review on UA. Bout to hit tha mall up tomorrow!!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Awesome review, UA delivering 8) , it’s great to see a brand take care of business like this.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +3 (from 5 votes)

great review. hope the shoe drops here in asia.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

I bought this shoe today based off this review. Incredible in person, I thought the strap might add some extra weight but it is so thin it looks great stylewise. Micro g cushioning has amazing step in feel. UA did this shoe right!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

GOT THE BLACK ICE TODAY! FRESH TO DEATH ON COURT!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Just came across your website and this was a great and thorough review. I will definitely refer back to this whenever my son wants to change his basketball sneakers. Thanks

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

after checkin dis yesterday i went n copped the blk ice today..luv it so far!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Awesome review. Cant wait to put these on cuz I absolutely love the Kobe IVs.

word up to lacing up tight

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

I really appreciate all the kind words, fellow sneakerheads. I try to be as impartial as possible and just shoot straight. Some shoes rock, others fail, but we all want to know what to expect, so thanks, and as long as John lets me I will be here doing what I do.

As for TommyGunz, I started to not comment, but I will. If you are accusing me of hyping a shoe, fine, I do. But only when the shoe is deserving, and these are. Highly so, especially for a first offering. I got the shoes two weeks ago, so to question HOW I got them early is absolutely ludicrous. That is how this works – we get them early, test them, review them before drop, and you know what is what. To imply I am dishonest or taking bribes to give good reviews, well, go check out that “Other” site if you are looking for a biased review. They still haven’t met a Nike shoe that sucked. I have and I will call it that way. I have no need to lie, or try to get your approval, on here, SC, or Niketalk, as I am known and repsected on all three for giving the straightness.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)

Next up – adiZero Rose. Pure.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)

Nice. I’m getting ready to put on my zebra stripe for winter b-ball and I’m always looking for a shoe that makes me look good when I report that foul. (and that keep my feet feeling good throughout the game). I went to Dick’s Sporting Goods to try on a pair but they’re only selling them online.

Anybody know if they run true to size if I’m ordering online?

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Philly, I wear a 10.5 in all Kobe’s and Lebrons, as well as last year’s adidas Supers, so you should be okay.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

These shoes look sick. I already got a pair for bball but iv decided ima get these and ill use the hyperdunks for something else.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Your reviews are really good Duke! Thanks.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Awesome Review! Thanks for supporting our Brand, I work at UA, and It’s great to hear real sneakerheads pay attention to all the little details we work so hard to put together. THANK YOU!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

@duke4005 i was wondering about the traction does it hold up because to me traction is everything and if that doesn’t work then the shoe is useless to me.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

James, so far, aftert almost 4 months, traction has held up greatly. This shoe has been a tank and I am still very pleased with it. I wouls probably grade it higher now than when new.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

I’m 6’2″ weigh 210 lbs, and make pretty hard cutts a lot and can never seem to find a shoe that can last very long.

Just ordered a pair, thought they looked cool and durrible. Found this review and now i can’t wait to check them out!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Duke, I know this review was done a while ago but can you give me some insight on the durability of this shoe? I ball outdoors a lot so the sole would have to last. Right now I’m balling in Sharkalaids as an outdoor kick but the sole is so worn out you can actually touch the zoom air.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post a comment

css.php