Comments: (21)

Air Jordan 2012 On Some Guy’s Foot

AJ2012 A.

Building on the interchangeable midsole concept of the Air Jordan 2011, next year’s Jumpman flagship shoe takes user customization to the next level.

The Air Jordan 2012 comes bundled in a “Flight System” package allowing the wearer options between two dynamic fit liners and three cushioned “Performance Rides” in the brand’s “Quick,” “Air,” and “Explosive” silos. Marked for a $223 price point, the fully stacked Air Jordan 2012 “Flight System” arrives on February 11, 2012.

But the shoe you see on Some Guy‘s foot here is more of a base configuration and arrives later.

This is a first look at the Air Jordan 2012 A model which features a “Low & Lite” interior fit, both encapsulated Air and Zoom Air built into the removable midsole/sockliner, and two sets of laces for an added bit of superficial customization. This “Flight Style” designated Air Jordan 2012 option brings the retail label back down under the double bill watermark, set for $180, and comes with a February 23, 2012 launch date.

via HoopChina

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Category : Air Jordan, Jordan Brand

Comments (21)

hahaha…..oh how the mighty have fallen!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 8 votes)

…the JORDAN BRAND is officially dead.RETROs are the ONLY thing this company can rely on.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: -2 (from 4 votes)

Call me crazy….. But I like it. Thus shoe has cone a long way since I saw the first rendering back.in June? I believe. I here flywire but Wtv….. Wish they would just use leather. Personally I don’t care about a couple extra oz.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.0/5 (4 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 6 votes)

=(. ‘sup with tinker giving us an hour of his time and cranking out something once again iconic on his ipad?

please? PLEASE!

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

no wonder Tinker makes shoes in an hour on his iPad…. because its easy to make a SHITTY shoe in an hour. dud if this had no jumpman they are worse than payless and kmart shoes my nigga

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.4/5 (5 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 5 votes)

Air Jordans are just like the heavyweight division of pro boxing, your best days are behind you.

Anybody who rocks these are…………………………….Lame.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.0/5 (6 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: -2 (from 8 votes)

Terrible………..crude design, rehashed tech, that basically tries to bank on the ever growing LOGO(next shoe will be all-logo probably to hide the lack of effort) to sell the shoe.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.3/5 (7 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 10 votes)

Just noticed the Foam One/Pro shape.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

might cop the 2012 A for balling in. but no way am i paying $180 for it let alone
let alone the $223 for the “flight system” 2012.

see you at the outlets 2012 A

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

these are fugly & too expensive smh JB

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

These unfortunately will hit the outlets or go on sale for deep discounts. The 2011′s were great but still hit the sales racks. Matter of fact there is a mom and pop spot that’s selling the warrior pack colorways buy 1 get 1 free.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)

Maaan.. UH-UH. Not for $180, not for $223. Daaammn. These are capital F.U.G.L.Y.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

I’m now old and I’m just going off of memory, but I’ve heard this too many times to ignore it by this point.

1992 – What? No air window? Garbage.

1993 – STILL no air wondow? Carpet on the tongue, they not even trying anymore.

1996 – Black patent on a Jordan? HAHAHA. These will never sell.

1997 – That toe piece makes these look like Donald Duck. Ugliest shoe J ever.

1999 – The sole looks like some fool with his teeth knocked out.

Ever since the 6 passed by, every Jay has been hated on for months before somebody bought them. The only reason the old shoes look good, is because MJ was wearing them while he made Ewing look ridiculous. These may be ugly and overpriced, but you fools act like the old shoes were always beautiful, a bargain and didn’t hurt your feet after 20 minutes.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 6 votes)

i might officially throw away my jordans and pull a kemba walker start with jordans now UNDER ARMOUR

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 6 votes)

^^^^^@SLICE. You are correct sir! I believe they will hit the sales racks though and then I will scoop a pair. No need to pay retail when you can buy at a discount in the upcoming months.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 4 votes)

Wow, these shoes look lame. The 2011′s sucked performance wise, but at least they looked half decent. I will definitely not be playing $180 for these.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Can Jordans just focus on making a sweet looking shoe and stop focusing and doing the gimmicky interchangeable midsoles? No matter what, Jordans and Nike already have solid cushioning and midsoles. People are not going to buy it for the interchangeable midsoles, they are going to buy it for the look. It’s been going down hill since the Air Jordan XXIII.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

They should of made the top half of the shoe one piece
instead of having gaps in it. If this shoe didn’t have the J symbol it would look like a $30 pair of shoes from the Chinese emporium.

Retro the 17 Plus in 2012. Please

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

They should have designed it unique way because competitions are bit tight today, now that Kobe and Wase has their own shoe line too. They should have done better. I like the design though and the interchangeable booties are undeniably unique.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

@slice seems like they didnt try very hard man…let down. im 30 and i heard all the same things too, but every “J” had something to admire about it, even if it was, “ugly” a j being ugly meant “i dont quite understand them being ahead of the times” but this shoe is uninspiring. im trying really hard not to h8 man, trust me.

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

If they remove the piece of leather of the toe and drop some original color ways it would be dope. Black white with a clear red bottom. White red an a lil black. All black with sued and clear red bottom an a red jump man. Fly wire is dope they should have left the leather off the toe. But like yall said wait about seven months and they’ll be like $69

VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post a comment